制度分析视角下大学公益性农技推广组织模式与运行机制研究

项目名称： 制度分析视角下大学公益性农技推广组织模式与运行机制研究

项目编号： No.71303117

项目类型： 青年科学基金项目

立项/批准年度： 2014

项目学科： 管理科学

项目作者： 刘晓光

作者单位： 南京农业大学

项目金额： 19万元

中文摘要： 健全公益性农业科技推广体系是转变农业发展方式，实现农业现代化的关键。大学公益性农业科技推广能改善现有农业科技推广体系投入不足、公益性弱化、人员素质不高和技术成果转化率较低的现状，发挥高等教育科技第一生产力和人才第一资源重要结合点的优势，已成为农村发展的重要依托。既有大学公益性农业科技推广组织模式与运行机制，在实践中存在战略和目标模糊、组织结构不清、非正式网络不完备等问题，而相关研究多为描述性介绍，且较少关注中观层面的组织场域。申请者的前期研究发现，系统考虑组织特性与组织环境的制度安排才会形成良好的组织模式及其运行机制。本项目拟以组织分析的制度理论为指导，应用文献分析、案例研究、问卷调查和统计分析，借鉴国际经验，分步构建并验证大学公益性农业科技推广"影响因素-组织模式-运行机制"三层映射框架，以探索在公共组织为主体的公益性活动中各组织之间协同的制度设计，丰富农业推广理论，拓展制度分析的范围。

中文关键词： 大学；公益性农技推广；组织模式；运行机制；制度分析

英文摘要： Improving non-profit agricultural science and technology extension system is essential to agricultural development transformation and modernization. Non-profit agricultural science and technology extension in the universities can make up for deficiencies in the existing agricultural science and technology extension system and has have been an essential support for rural development of China. In fact, existing agricultural science and technology extension system have been facing the insufficient financial investment, weaken non-profit function, lower human resource quality and technological transfer ratio. As we known, science and technology is the first productivity and talent is the first resource of development. The universities as an important combination of science and technology and talent can do more to improve existing system. There are several problems both in practices and research on the organizational patterns and its operational mechanisms of non-profit agricultural science and technology extension, such as fuzzy strategies and targets, unclear organizational structure and leaky informal networks in practice; less concerned on organizational field and overmuch descriptive study in related research. The applicant's previous study found that institutional arrangement can't develop good organizational

英文关键词： university；nonprofit agricultural sci.&tech. extension；organizational patterns；operational mechanisms；institutional analysis