Leveraging civic data, divided into 3 categories spending, infrastructure and citizen feedback, can present a clear picture of the priorities, performance, and pain-points of a city. Data driven insights highlight the current issues faced by citizens as well as disparity between government spending and quality of work, and can aid in providing effective solutions. City infrastructure; footpaths, lighting, and parks, describe the living quality of citizens and can be compared to the annual spending in these sectors to track effectiveness. Analyzing complaints ensures citizen feedback is taken into account during both long-term planning and in short-term solutions to pinpoint critical areas of improvement. Integrating an analysis loop and data driven dashboards can help in improving performance of municipal corporations, while adding transparency between citizens and the city officials. In the paper, constituency rankings across the city infrastructure indicated a low importance towards greenery in terms of Parks, where each constituency has less than 2% of their area as a park. As populations in these areas are already high and increasing, this is likely to worsen in the coming years. Comparing the results with complaints, surprisingly the rankings of footpaths in constituencies were contrary to the number of complaints in these constituencies, with high ranking constituencies receiving the highest number of complaints, which would require further analysis. In terms of street lights, the areas with low quality lighting were associated with a large number of complaints from citizens, indicating that action needs to be taken immediately. Overall, a text analysis of complaints across constituencies reflected the everyday struggles of the city with the top keywords 'roads' and 'vehicles', followed by 'footpaths' and 'garbage', which are both critical problems in Bangalore City today.
翻译:利用公民数据,分为支出、基础设施和公民反馈三个类别,可以清楚地反映城市的优先事项、业绩和痛苦点。数据驱动的洞察力突出公民当前面临的问题以及政府支出和工作质量之间的差别,有助于提供有效的解决方案。城市基础设施;步行道路、照明和公园,描述公民的生活质量,并与这些部门的年度支出相比,以跟踪成效。分析投诉确保公民反馈在长期规划和确定关键改进领域的短期解决方案中得到考虑。整合分析环路和数据驱动仪表板有助于改善市政公司的业绩,同时增加公民和城市官员之间的透明度。在报纸上,城市基础设施的选民排名表明在公园绿化方面不太重要,因为每个选区的面积不到2%。由于这些地区的人口已经很高且在不断增加,因此在未来几年中情况可能会恶化。通过比较投诉的结果,令人惊讶的是选区的脚本排名排名和数据驱动仪表仪表板能够帮助改善市政公司的业绩,同时增加公民和城市官员之间的透明度。在报纸上,各个选区的排名显示绿化程度,而城市的排名数字则与城市的排名是高层次相关,因此,城市的排名与城市的排名是直接的排名有关。