An increasing number of consumer-oriented head-mounted displays (HMD) for augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) are capable of finger and hand tracking. We report on the accuracy of off-the-shelf VR and AR HMDs when used for touch-based tasks such as pointing or drawing. Specifically, we report on the finger tracking accuracy of the VR head-mounted displays Oculus Quest, Vive Pro and the Leap Motion controller, when attached to a VR HMD, as well as the finger tracking accuracy of the AR head-mounted displays Microsoft HoloLens 2 and Magic Leap. We present the results of two experiments in which we compare the accuracy for absolute and relative pointing tasks using both human participants and a robot. The results suggest that HTC Vive has a lower spatial accuracy than the Oculus Quest and Leap Motion and that the Microsoft HoloLens 2 provides higher spatial accuracy than Magic Leap One. These findings can serve as decision support for researchers and practitioners in choosing which systems to use in the future.
翻译:越来越多的面向消费者的扩大和虚拟现实(AR/VR)的头架显示器(HMD)能够进行手指和手追踪。我们报告用于指针或绘图等触摸性任务时现成VR和AR HMD的准确性。具体地说,我们报告VR头架显示器(Oculus Quest)、Vive Pro和Lip Motion控制器(附在VR HMD之后)的手指跟踪准确性,以及AR头架显示器微软 HoloLens 2 和 Magi Leap 的精确性。我们介绍两个实验的结果,其中我们用人类参与者和机器人比较绝对和相对指向任务的准确性。结果显示,HTC Vive的空间准确性低于Oculs Quest和Leap Motion,微软HoloLens 2提供的空间准确性高于魔术Leap 1。这些结果可以作为研究人员和从业人员选择未来使用何种系统的决定支持。