In scientific research, many hypotheses relate to the comparison of two independent groups. Usually, it is of interest to use a design (i.e., the allocation of sample sizes $m$ and $n$ for fixed $N = m + n$) that maximizes the power of the applied statistical test. It is known that the two-sample t-tests for homogeneous and heterogeneous variances may lose substantial power when variances are unequal but equally large samples are used. We demonstrate that this is not the case for the non-parametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-test, whose application in biometrical research fields is motivated by two examples from cancer research. We prove the optimality of the design $m = n$ in case of symmetric and identically shaped distributions using normal approximations and show that this design generally offers power only negligibly lower than the optimal design for a wide range of distributions. Please cite this paper as published in the Biometrical Journal (https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201600022).
翻译:在科学研究中,许多假设都与两个独立组群的比较有关。通常,使用一种设计(即样本大小分配单位为m美元和n美元,固定美元=m美元+n美元),最大限度地发挥应用统计测试的功率,这是值得注意的,众所周知,在差异不平等但使用同样大样本时,对同质和异质差异的两次抽样测试可能会失去巨大的力量。我们证明,对于非参数Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-stest来说,情况并非如此,因为在生物统计研究领域的应用中有两个癌症研究实例。我们证明,在使用正常近似法进行对称和相同形状分布的情况下,设计最理想的用$m=n美元,并表明,这种设计通常只能提供比广泛分布的最佳设计低得多的权力。请引用《生物学期刊》(https://doi.org/10.1002/Bimj.20600-2002)发表的这一论文。