Recommender systems are the algorithms which select, filter, and personalize content across many of the worlds largest platforms and apps. As such, their positive and negative effects on individuals and on societies have been extensively theorized and studied. Our overarching question is how to ensure that recommender systems enact the values of the individuals and societies that they serve. Addressing this question in a principled fashion requires technical knowledge of recommender design and operation, and also critically depends on insights from diverse fields including social science, ethics, economics, psychology, policy and law. This paper is a multidisciplinary effort to synthesize theory and practice from different perspectives, with the goal of providing a shared language, articulating current design approaches, and identifying open problems. It is not a comprehensive survey of this large space, but a set of highlights identified by our diverse author cohort. We collect a set of values that seem most relevant to recommender systems operating across different domains, then examine them from the perspectives of current industry practice, measurement, product design, and policy approaches. Important open problems include multi-stakeholder processes for defining values and resolving trade-offs, better values-driven measurements, recommender controls that people use, non-behavioral algorithmic feedback, optimization for long-term outcomes, causal inference of recommender effects, academic-industry research collaborations, and interdisciplinary policy-making.
翻译:咨询系统是选择、过滤和将内容个人化的算法,它遍布世界上许多最大的平台和应用程序。因此,它们对个人和社会的积极和消极影响得到了广泛的理论化和研究。我们的首要问题是如何确保建议系统能够颁布他们所服务的个人和社会的价值观。我们以原则性的方式解决这一问题需要建议设计和操作的技术知识,并且关键地取决于来自社会科学、伦理、经济学、心理学、政策和法律等不同领域的深刻见解。本文件是一个多学科的努力,目的是从不同角度综合理论和实践,目的是提供一种共同的语言,阐明目前的设计方法,并找出开放的问题。它不是对这一大空间的全面调查,而是由我们不同的作者组群确定的一套亮点。我们收集了一套似乎与在不同领域运作的建议系统最相关的价值观,然后从当前行业实践、计量、产品设计和政策方法的角度来研究这些价值观。重要的公开问题包括确定价值观和解决交易的多利益攸关方进程、更好的价值驱动测量、建议性控制,这是人们在决策、非研究-分析-分析结果中所使用的、非研究-分析-分析-分析结果。