Standardization of data items collected in paediatric clinical trials is an important but challenging issue. The Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) data standards are well understood by the pharmaceutical industry but lack the implementation of some paediatric specific concepts. When a paediatric concept is absent within CDISC standards, companies and research institutions take multiple approaches in the collection of paediatric data, leading to different implementations of standards and potentially limited utility for reuse. To overcome these challenges, the conect4children consortium has developed a cross-cutting paediatric data dictionary (CCPDD). The dictionary was built over three phases - scoping (including a survey sent out to ten industrial and 34 academic partners to gauge interest), creation of a longlist and consensus building for the final set of terms. The dictionary was finalized during a workshop with attendees from academia, hospitals, industry and CDISC. The attendees held detailed discussions on each data item and participated in the final vote on the inclusion of the item in the CCPDD. Nine industrial and 34 academic partners responded to the survey, which showed overall interest in the development of the CCPDD. Following the final vote on 27 data items, three were rejected, six were deferred to the next version and a final opinion was sought from CDISC. The first version of the CCPDD with 25 data items was released in August 2019. The continued use of the dictionary has the potential to ensure the collection of standardized data that is interoperable and can later be pooled and reused for other applications. The dictionary is already being used for case report form creation in three clinical trials. The CCPDD will also serve as one of the inputs to the Paediatric User Guide, which is being developed by CDISC.
翻译:临床数据交换标准联合会(CDIS)的数据标准为制药业所熟知,但缺乏某些儿科特定概念的实施。当CDIS标准缺乏儿科概念时,公司和研究机构在收集儿科数据方面采取多种办法,导致不同标准的实施,并可能限制了再利用的效用。为了克服这些挑战,CCPDD 组合开发了一个交叉的儿科数据词典(CCPDD)。词典是分三个阶段构建的——范围界定(包括向10个工业伙伴和34个学术伙伴发出调查,以衡量兴趣),为最后一套术语创建一个长名单和共识。当CDIS标准标准缺乏儿科概念时,公司和研究机构在收集儿科数据方面采取多种方法,导致对每个数据项目进行详细讨论,并参与关于将该项目纳入CCPDD的最后表决。九个工业伙伴和34个学术伙伴对调查作出了答复,表明CCPDD的开发总体上感兴趣。在对27个数据项目的最后表决后,3个临床清单清单清单和CLDR版本的应用被否决,C版本的C版本被推迟到8月25版。</s>