Practitioners use Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) in different problems for about sixty years. Besides, Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) are an alternative to HMMs and appear in the literature as different and somewhat concurrent models. We propose two contributions. First, we show that basic Linear-Chain CRFs (LC-CRFs), considered as different from the HMMs, are in fact equivalent to them in the sense that for each LC-CRF there exists a HMM - that we specify - whom posterior distribution is identical to the given LC-CRF. Second, we show that it is possible to reformulate the generative Bayesian classifiers Maximum Posterior Mode (MPM) and Maximum a Posteriori (MAP) used in HMMs, as discriminative ones. The last point is of importance in many fields, especially in Natural Language Processing (NLP), as it shows that in some situations dropping HMMs in favor of CRFs was not necessary.
翻译:此外,有条件随机场(CRFs)是HMMs的替代物,在文献中作为不同和比较平行的模式出现。我们提出两种意见。首先,我们表明基本的线性-恰因通用报告格式(LC-CRFs)被认为不同于HMMs,实际上与它们相当,因为对于每个LC-CRF来说,每个LC-CRF都有一个HMM(我们所指明的)----后期分布与给定的LC-CRF相同。第二,我们表明,有可能重新配置在HMMs中使用的典型的Bayesian分类师最大前端模式(MPM)和最大后部模式(MAP),作为歧视性模式。最后一点在许多领域都很重要,特别是在自然语言处理(NLP)中,因为这表明在某些情况下不需要向通用报告格式倾弃HMMs。