Decentralization has been widely acknowledged as a core virtue of blockchains. However, in the past, there have been few measurement studies on measuring and comparing the actual level of decentralization between existing blockchains using multiple metrics and granularities. This paper presents a new comparison study of the degree of decentralization in Bitcoin and Ethereum, the two most prominent blockchains, with various decentralization metrics and different granularities within the time dimension. Specifically, we measure the degree of decentralization in the two blockchains during 2019 by computing the distribution of mining power with three metrics (Gini coefficient, Shannon entropy, and Nakamoto coefficient) as well as three granularities (days, weeks, and months). Our measurement results with different metrics and granularities reveal the same trend that, compared with each other, the degree of decentralization in Bitcoin is higher, while the degree of decentralization in Ethereum is more stable. To obtain the cross-interval information missed in the fixed window based measurements, we propose the sliding window based measurement approach. The corresponding results demonstrate that the use of sliding windows could reveal additional cross-interval information overlooked by the fixed window based measurements, thus enhancing the effectiveness of measuring decentralization in terms of continuous trends and abnormal situations. We believe that the methodologies and findings in this paper can facilitate future studies of decentralization in blockchains.
翻译:权力下放被公认为是块链的核心优点,但过去很少用多种计量和颗粒衡量和比较现有块链之间的实际权力下放程度的计量研究,本文对两个最突出的块链Bitcoin和Etheurum的权力下放程度进行了新的比较研究,这两个块链在时间方面有各种权力下放指标和不同的颗粒,具体地说,我们衡量2019年两个块链的权力下放程度,方法是用三种指标(基尼系数、香农坚固系数和中本系数)以及三个颗粒(日、周和月)计算采矿力的分配情况,并比较现有块链链的实际权力下放程度。我们用不同的计量结果和颗粒显示了与这两个最突出的块链块相比的权力下放程度较高的趋势,而Eteurum的权力下放程度则更为稳定。我们建议采用以滑动窗口为基础的计量方法,从而表明,在采用浮动窗口进行测量的结果表明,采用浮动窗口的做法可以显示,以不同指标和不同方法衡量今后的权力下放状况,因此,我们相信,以持续衡量固定的平面方法可以显示,以持续衡量的平面方式衡量。