Wearable devices generate different types of physiological data about the individuals. These data can provide valuable insights for medical researchers and clinicians that cannot be availed through traditional measures. Researchers have historically relied on survey responses or observed behavior. Interestingly, physiological data can provide a richer amount of user cognition than that obtained from any other sources, including the user himself. Therefore, the inexpensive consumer-grade wearable devices have become a point of interest for the health researchers. In addition, they are also used in continuous remote health monitoring and sometimes by the insurance companies. However, the biggest concern for such kind of use cases is the privacy of the individuals. There are a few privacy mechanisms, such as abstraction and k-anonymity, are widely used in information systems. Recently, Differential Privacy (DP) has emerged as a proficient technique to publish privacy sensitive data, including data from wearable devices. In this paper, we have conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify, select and critically appraise researches in DP as well as to understand different techniques and exiting use of DP in wearable data publishing. Based on our study we have identified the limitations of proposed solutions and provided future directions.
翻译:这些数据可以为医学研究人员和临床医生提供宝贵的见解,而传统措施无法利用这些数据。研究人员历来依赖调查反应或观察到的行为。有趣的是,生理数据能够提供比任何其他来源,包括用户本人获得的更丰富的用户认知量。因此,低廉的消费者级穿戴装置已成为卫生研究人员感兴趣的一个点。此外,它们还被用于连续远程健康监测,有时保险公司也使用这些数据。然而,这类使用案例的最大关注点是个人的隐私。在信息系统中广泛使用少数隐私机制,例如抽象和k-匿名。最近,差异隐私(DP)已成为公布隐私敏感数据,包括可磨损装置数据的一种精明技术。在这份文件中,我们进行了系统文学审查,以查明、选择和严格评估DP的研究,并了解不同技术和在可磨损数据发布中退出DP的使用。根据我们的研究,我们查明了拟议解决方案的局限性和今后提供的方向。