Communication facilitates coordination, but coordination might fail if there's too much uncertainty. I discuss a scenario in which vagueness-driven uncertainty undermines the possibility of publicly sharing a belief. I then show that asserting an epistemic modal sentence, 'Might p', can reveal the speaker's uncertainty, and that this may improve the chances of coordination despite the lack of a common epistemic ground. This provides a game-theoretic rationale for epistemic modality. The account draws on a standard relational semantics for epistemic modality, Stalnaker's theory of assertion as informative update, and a Bayesian framework for reasoning under uncertainty.
翻译:沟通可以促进协调,但如果不确定因素太多,协调可能会失败。我讨论了模糊因素驱动的不确定性会破坏公开分享信仰的可能性的情况。然后,我表明,主张一个缩略语模式句“Might p”可以揭示发言者的不确定性,这可能会增加协调机会,尽管缺乏一个共同的缩略语基础。这为缩写模式提供了一种游戏理论原理理由。这个概念借鉴了一种标准的缩写模式关系语义、Stalnker的理论作为信息性更新,以及一个不确定性推理的巴耶斯框架。