Authorship verification (AV) is a fundamental research task in digital text forensics, which addresses the problem of whether two texts were written by the same person. In recent years, a variety of AV methods have been proposed that focus on this problem and can be divided into two categories: The first category refers to such methods that are based on explicitly defined features, where one has full control over which features are considered and what they actually represent. The second category, on the other hand, relates to such AV methods that are based on implicitly defined features, where no control mechanism is involved, so that any character sequence in a text can serve as a potential feature. However, AV methods belonging to the second category bear the risk that the topic of the texts may bias their classification predictions, which in turn may lead to misleading conclusions regarding their results. To tackle this problem, we propose a preprocessing technique called POSNoise, which effectively masks topic-related content in a given text. In this way, AV methods are forced to focus on such text units that are more related to the writing style. Our empirical evaluation based on six AV methods (falling into the second category) and seven corpora shows that POSNoise leads to better results compared to a well-known topic masking approach in 34 out of 42 cases, with an increase in accuracy of up to 10%.
翻译:作者核查(AV)是数字文本法证中的一项基本研究任务,它解决了两个文本是否由同一人撰写的问题。近年来,提出了各种AV方法,侧重于这一问题,可以分为两类:第一类是指基于明确界定特征的方法,对哪些特征得到完全控制,哪些特征得到考虑,这些特征实际上代表什么。另一方面,第二类涉及基于隐含定义特征的AV方法,没有涉及任何控制机制,因此文本中的任何字符序列都可以成为潜在的特征。但是,属于第二类的AV方法有风险,因为案文的题目可能偏向其分类预测,而这又可能导致对其结果作出误导性结论。为了解决这一问题,我们提出了一种称为POSnoise的预处理技术,它有效地掩盖了某一文本中与主题有关的内容。在这种方式上,AV方法被迫侧重于与写作风格更为相关的文本单元。我们根据六种AV方法进行的经验评估(在第二个类别中属于第二个类别),而属于第二类的AV方法则可能导致其分类预测有偏差,这反过来又可能导致对其结果作出误导性结论。为了解决这个问题,我们建议一种称为POSnoise的方法,它比一个有更清楚的PO 10。