Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) aims to transfer knowledge from a well-labeled source domain to a different but related unlabeled target domain with identical label space. Currently, the main workhorse for solving UDA is domain alignment, which has proven successful. However, it is often difficult to find an appropriate source domain with identical label space. A more practical scenario is so-called partial domain adaptation (PDA) in which the source label set or space subsumes the target one. Unfortunately, in PDA, due to the existence of the irrelevant categories in the source domain, it is quite hard to obtain a perfect alignment, thus resulting in mode collapse and negative transfer. Although several efforts have been made by down-weighting the irrelevant source categories, the strategies used tend to be burdensome and risky since exactly which irrelevant categories are unknown. These challenges motivate us to find a relatively simpler alternative to solve PDA. To achieve this, we first provide a thorough theoretical analysis, which illustrates that the target risk is bounded by both model smoothness and between-domain discrepancy. Considering the difficulty of perfect alignment in solving PDA, we turn to focus on the model smoothness while discard the riskier domain alignment to enhance the adaptability of the model. Specifically, we instantiate the model smoothness as a quite simple intra-domain structure preserving (IDSP). To our best knowledge, this is the first naive attempt to address the PDA without domain alignment. Finally, our empirical results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that IDSP is not only superior to the PDA SOTAs by a significant margin on some benchmarks (e.g., +10% on Cl->Rw and +8% on Ar->Rw ), but also complementary to domain alignment in the standard UDA
翻译:不受监督的域适应(UDA) 旨在将知识从标签良好的源域域向不同但相关但没有标签的目标域转移,并带有相同的标签空间。目前,解决 UDA的主要工作马程是域对齐,这已证明是成功的。然而,通常很难找到具有相同标签空间的适当源域。更实际的设想是所谓的部分域适应(PDA),即源标签设置或空间对准目标。不幸的是,在PDA中,由于源域存在不相关的类别,因此很难实现完全的对齐,从而导致模式的崩溃和负性转移。尽管通过对不相关的源类别进行下加权,解决UDA的主要工作是累赘和风险。然而,由于这些难题,我们很难找到一个相对简单的域调整(PDA) 。为了达到这个目的,我们首先提供彻底的理论分析, 目标风险由模型的平滑朗和跨行基准值的对齐。考虑到在解决 PDADA时很难做到完全的对齐,我们转向了模型的精度的精细度,而将数据对SAL-RA的精度的精度调整。