This article proposes an historical and mathematical introduction to Lorenzen's "Algebraische und logistische Untersuchungen \"uber freie Verb\"ande". These "Investigations" appeared in 1951 in The journal of symbolic logic. They have immediately been recognised as a landmark in the history of infinitary proof theory, but their approach and method of proof have not been incorporated into the corpus of proof theory. More precisely, the admissibility of cut is proved by double induction, on the cut formula and on the complexity of the derivations, without using any ordinal assignment, contrary to the presentation of cut elimination in most standard texts on proof theory. We propose a translation (arXiv:1710.08138) and this introduction with the intent of giving a new impetus to their reception. We also propose a translation of a preliminary manuscript, "A preorder-theoretic proof of consistency", with the kind permission of Lorenzen's daughter, Jutta Reinhardt. The "Investigations" are best known for providing a constructive proof of consistency for ramified type theory without axiom of reducibility. Lorenzen does so by showing that it is a part of a trivially consistent "inductive calculus" that describes our knowledge of arithmetic without detour. The proof resorts only to the inductive definition of formulas and theorems. He proposes furthermore a definition of a semilattice, of a distributive lattice, of a pseudocomplemented semilattice, and of a countably complete boolean lattice as deductive calculuses, and shows how to present them for constructing the respective free object over a given preordered set. This work illustrates that lattice theory is a bridge between algebra and logic. The preliminary manuscript, given as an appendix, contains already the main ideas and applies them to a constructive proof of consistency for elementary number theory.
翻译:文章建议从历史和数学角度来介绍Lorenzen的“ Algebraische und friendische Untersoudungen ” “ Untersoudungen ” 。 这些“ Investigation”出现在1951年的《象征性逻辑》杂志中。 这些“Investigation”立刻被公认为是无尽证据理论史上的一个里程碑, 但是它们的方法和举证方法并没有被纳入证据理论的主体。 更确切地说, 削减的可接受性通过双重感应、 双感应公式和正反正产变, 与大多数标准证据理论文本中关于削减理论删除的表述相反。 我们建议翻译( ar: Xiv: 1710.08. 138), 并以此为新动力进行初步手稿的翻译, “ 预序- 理论性证明一致性 ”, 由Lorrenzencialtalt 和正数的精度解释, 最能用来提供建设性的证据。