Before 2020, the way occupants utilized the built environment had been changing slowly towards scenarios in which occupants have more choice and flexibility in where and how they work. The global COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this phenomenon rapidly through lockdowns and hybrid work arrangements. Many occupants and employers are considering keeping some of these flexibility-based strategies due to their benefits and cost impacts. This paper simulates various scenarios related to the operational technologies and policies of a real-world campus using a district-scale City Energy Analyst (CEA) model that is calibrated with measured energy and occupancy profiles extracted from WiFi data. These scenarios demonstrate the energy impact of ramping building operations up and down more rapidly and effectively to the flex-based work strategies that may solidify. The scenarios show a 4-12% decrease in space cooling demand due to occupant absenteeism if centralized building system operation is in place, but as high as 21-68% if occupancy-driven building controls are implemented. The paper discusses technologies and strategies that are important in this paradigm shift of operations.
翻译:在2020年之前,占用者利用建筑环境的方式一直在缓慢地变化,转向占用者在工作地点和方式上拥有更多选择和灵活性的情景。全球COVID-19大流行通过封锁和混合工作安排迅速加速了这一现象。许多占用者和雇主正考虑保留其中一些基于灵活性的战略,因为其好处和成本影响。本文件模拟了与现实世界校园的运作技术和政策有关的各种情景,使用了从WiFi数据中提取的以节能和占用特征校准的区规模城市能源分析器模型。这些情景表明,由于集中的建筑系统运行到位,建筑工程加速上下运行对可巩固的灵活工作战略的能源影响会更快、更快速、更有效地降低。这些情景表明,如果集中的建筑系统运行到位,空间冷却需求会减少4-12%,但如果实施使用率驱动的建筑控制,则高达21-68%。文件讨论了在业务模式转变中非常重要的技术和战略。