Correctly identifying an individual's social context from passively worn sensors holds promise for delivering just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to treat social anxiety disorder. In this study, we present results using passively collected data from a within-subject experiment that assessed physiological response across different social contexts (i.e, alone vs. with others), social phases (i.e., pre- and post-interaction vs. during an interaction), social interaction sizes (i.e., dyadic vs. group interactions), and levels of social threat (i.e., implicit vs. explicit social evaluation). Participants in the study ($N=46$) reported moderate to severe social anxiety symptoms as assessed by the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale ($\geq$34 out of 80). Univariate paired difference tests, multivariate random forest models, and follow-up cluster analyses were used to explore physiological response patterns across different social and non-social contexts. Our results suggest that social context is more reliably distinguishable than social phase, group size, or level of social threat, but that there is considerable variability in physiological response patterns even among these distinguishable contexts. Implications for real-world context detection and deployment of JITAIs are discussed.
翻译:正确地从佩戴的传感器中识别个体的社交环境可在适当的时候提供自适应干预(JITAIs)来治疗社交焦虑障碍。在本研究中,我们展示了一个根据单个被试收集的数据的结果,评估不同社交环境(即独处与他人相处)、社交阶段(即交互前、交互后以及交互期间)、社交交互大小(即双人互动与群体互动)和社交威胁水平(即隐性与显性社交评估)下的生理反应。研究参与者($N=46$)根据社交互动焦虑量表报告了中度至重度的社交焦虑症状($\geq$34/80)。使用单变量配对差异检验、多变量随机森林模型和后续聚类分析来探讨不同社交和非社交环境下的生理反应模式。结果表明,社交环境比社交阶段、群体大小或社交威胁水平更可靠地可区分,但即使在这些可区分的环境中也存在相当的生理反应模式的差异性。讨论了实际应用中的情境检测和JITAIs的部署的影响。