Objective: Our objective is to explore how public entities in the role of platform providers can address this issue by enabling collaboration within their OGD ecosystems, both in terms of the OGD published on the underpinning platform, as well as any related Open Source Software (OSS) and standards. Method: We conducted an exploratory multiple-case study of four OGD ecosystems with diverse characteristics. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, and in one of the cases through a prolonged engagement. The data was then coded using a set of \textit{apriori} codes. Results: The study descriptively presents each case based on the coding, along with synthesis in the form of a conceptual model that highlights different attributes of OGD ecosystems. For example, we observe how collaboration can be enabled through different types of ownership of the platform provider, how the ecosystem's scope can vary, what roles the platform provider may undertake, how to enable open collaboration, and how to collaborate in terms of data sharing, OSS development, and standards. For each aspect, we provide recommendations based on the explored cases that, together with the model, may help public entities in designing and orchestrating new or existing OGD ecosystems. Conclusions: We conclude that enabling and facilitating collaboration in an OGD ecosystem is a complex exercise, yet believe that it offers new ways for public entities in how they can leverage the power of open innovation to address their goals and directives.
翻译:目标:我们的目标是探讨公共实体作为平台提供方的作用,如何能够通过在基础平台上公布的OGD以及任何相关的开放源码软件(OSS)和标准,在OGD生态系统内开展合作,从而在OGD生态系统内促进协作,从而解决这一问题。方法:我们对具有不同特点的四个OGD生态系统进行了探索性的多案例研究。数据是通过半结构访谈收集的,在其中一个情况下通过长期接触收集的。数据随后使用一套\textit{ariori}代码对数据进行编码。结果:研究描述了每个案例,同时以概念模型的形式综合介绍了每个案例,突出OGD生态系统的不同属性。例如,我们观察如何通过平台提供方的不同类型的所有权、生态系统的范围如何不同、平台提供方可以发挥哪些作用、如何促成公开合作、如何在数据共享、开放源码软件开发和标准方面开展合作。结果:我们根据所探讨的案例提出建议,这些案例与模型一道,可能有助于公共实体设计和规划新的或现有的OGD生态系统生态系统的组合。我们观察如何通过平台提供新的或现有的生态系统创新能力,我们得出结论:如何使公众能够利用新的生态系统创新。