In the meantime, a wide variety of terminologies, motivations, approaches and evaluation criteria have been developed within the research field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). With the amount of XAI methods vastly growing, a taxonomy of methods is needed by researchers as well as practitioners: To grasp the breadth of the topic, compare methods, and to select the right XAI method based on traits required by a specific use-case context. In the literature many taxonomies for XAI methods of varying level of detail and depth can be found. While they often have a different focus, they also exhibit many points of overlap. This paper unifies these efforts, and provides a taxonomy of XAI methods that is complete with respect to notions present in the current state-of-research. In a structured literature analysis and meta-study we identified and reviewed more than 50 of the most cited and current surveys on XAI methods, metrics, and method traits. After summarizing them in a survey of surveys, we merge terminologies and concepts of the articles into a unified structured taxonomy. Single concepts therein are illustrated by in total more than 50 diverse selected example methods, which we categorize accordingly. The taxonomy may serve both beginners, researchers, and practitioners as a reference and wide-ranging overview on XAI method traits and aspects. Hence, it provides foundations for targeted, use-case-oriented, and context-sensitive future research.
翻译:同时,在可解释的人工智能(XAI)研究领域,已经制定了多种多样的术语、动机、方法和评价标准。随着XAI方法的大量增加,研究人员和从业者需要对方法进行分类:为了掌握专题的广度,比较方法,并根据特定使用情况要求的特征选择正确的XAI方法。在文献中,可以找到不同程度详细和深度的XAI方法的许多分类,虽然它们往往有不同的侧重点,但也显示出许多重叠点。随着XAI方法的大量增加,随着XAI方法的量性能的扩大,研究人员和从业者都需要对方法进行分类:在结构化的文献分析和元研究中,我们确定并审查了50多项关于XAI方法、指标和方法特征的调查,在调查中对这些方法进行总结后,我们将条款的术语和概念合并成一个统一的结构化的分类。本文以总共50个以上的基础统一了这些努力,并提供了XAI方法的分类基础,并据此将一个选择的研究人员和性质分类。