Trade-offs between accuracy and efficiency are found in multiple non-computing domains, such as law and medicine, which have developed rules and heuristics to guide how to balance accuracy against efficiency in conditions of uncertainty. While accuracy-efficiency trade-offs are also commonly acknowledged in some areas of computer science - perhaps to the point of mundanity - their policy implications remain poorly examined. We argue that, since examining accuracy-efficiency trade-offs has been useful for guiding governance in other domains, explicitly framing such trade-offs in computing is similarly useful for the governance of computer systems. Specifically, we focus our discussion on accountability mechanisms for real-time distributed ML systems. Understanding the policy implications in this area is particularly urgent because such systems, which include autonomous vehicles, tend to be high-stakes and safety-critical. We describe how the trade-off takes shape in real-world distributed computing systems and then show the interplay between such systems and ML algorithms, explaining in detail how accuracy and efficiency interact in distributed ML systems. We close by making specific calls to action to facilitate holding these systems, particularly the emerging technology of real-time distributed ML systems, to account.
翻译:在多种非计算领域,如法律和医学,在准确性与效率之间的取舍,在法律和医学等多个非计算领域,发现准确性与效率之间的取舍,以指导如何在不确定性条件下平衡准确性与效率。虽然在计算机科学的某些领域,准确性与效率的取舍也得到普遍承认,也许到了条件成熟的地步,但其政策影响仍然没有得到很好的审查。我们争辩说,由于对准确性与效率的取舍的审查对指导其他领域的治理非常有用,在计算机系统的治理方面明确设定这种取舍对计算机系统的治理同样有用。具体地说,我们把讨论重点放在实时分布的ML系统的问责机制上。了解这个领域的政策影响是特别紧迫的,因为这种系统,包括自主性工具,往往具有高度的取舍和安全的批评作用。我们描述了这种取舍如何在现实世界分布式计算机系统中成形,然后展示这些系统与ML算法之间的相互作用,详细解释在分布式 ML系统中的准确性与效率的相互作用。我们最后呼吁采取行动,以便利维持这些系统,特别是实时分布的ML系统的新兴技术,以核算。