Modeling fuzziness and imprecision in human rating data is a crucial problem in many research areas, including applied statistics, behavioral, social, and health sciences. Because of the interplay between cognitive, affective, and contextual factors, the process of answering survey questions is a complex task, which can barely be captured by standard (crisp) rating responses. Fuzzy rating scales have progressively been adopted to overcome some of the limitations of standard rating scales, including their inability to disentangle decision uncertainty from individual responses. The aim of this article is to provide a novel fuzzy scaling procedure which uses Item Response Theory trees (IRTrees) as a psychometric model for the stage-wise latent response process. In so doing, fuzziness of rating data is modeled using the overall rater's pattern of responses instead of being computed using a single-item based approach. This offers a consistent system for interpreting fuzziness in terms of individual-based decision uncertainty. A simulation study and two empirical applications are adopted to assess the characteristics of the proposed model and provide converging results about its effectiveness in modeling fuzziness and imprecision in rating data.
翻译:模拟人类评级数据的模糊性和不精确性是许多研究领域的一个关键问题,包括应用统计、行为学、社会学和健康科学。由于认知、感知和背景因素之间的相互作用,回答调查问题的过程是一项复杂的任务,几乎无法用标准(crisp)评级答复来捕捉。采用模糊的评级尺度是为了克服标准评级尺度的某些局限性,包括无法将决定不确定性与个别答复相混淆。本条的目的是提供一个新的模糊性缩放程序,利用项目反应理论树(IRTrees)作为阶段性潜在响应过程的心理计量模型。在这样做时,评级数据的模糊性是使用总体评级人的答复模式而不是使用单一项目为基础的方法来模拟而不是计算。这为解释基于个人决定不确定性的模糊性提供了一个一致的系统。采用了模拟研究和两种经验应用来评估拟议模型的特性,并提供关于其在模拟模糊性和评级数据不精确性方面的有效性的一致结果。