Conventional multi-agent path planners typically compute an ensemble of paths while optimizing a single objective, such as path length. However, many applications may require multiple objectives, say fuel consumption and completion time, to be simultaneously optimized during planning and these criteria may not be readily compared and sometimes lie in competition with each other. Naively applying existing multi-objective search algorithms to multi-agent path finding may prove to be inefficient as the size of the space of possible solutions, i.e., the Pareto-optimal set, can grow exponentially with the number of agents (the dimension of the search space). This article presents an approach named Multi-objective Conflict-based Search (MO-CBS) that bypasses this so-called curse of dimensionality by leveraging prior Conflict-based Search (CBS), a well-known algorithm for single-objective multi-agent path finding, and principles of dominance from multi-objective optimization literature. We prove that MO-CBS is able to compute the entire Pareto-optimal set. Our results show that MO-CBS can solve problem instances with hundreds of Pareto-optimal solutions which the standard multi-objective A* algorithms could not find within a bounded time.
翻译:常规多试管路路规划者通常在优化路径(如路径长度)等单一目标的同时计算各种路径。然而,许多应用可能要求多个目标,比如燃料消耗和完成时间,在规划期间同时优化,这些标准可能不易比较,有时是相互竞争。将现有的多客观搜索算法应用于多试管路的发现,可能证明效率低下,因为可能解决方案的空间大小,即Pareto-最优化集,随着物剂的数量(搜索空间的尺寸)的增速增长,可以成倍增长。这篇文章展示了一种名为多目标冲突搜索(MO-CBS)的方法,它通过利用先前基于冲突的搜索(CBS),即已知的单目标多试管路径发现法和多目标优化文献的主导原则,绕过所谓的维度诅咒。我们证明,M-CBS能够用数百个标准多目标解算法,无法在标准多目标解算法中找到。