Brands are facing heightened pressure from consumers to address social justice issues via social media channels. However, little guidance has been provided about whether and how a brand should engage in such conversations online. We use a multi-discipline, multi-data, and multi-method approach to clarify the conditions under which social justice activism impacts consumers' brand evaluations, as well as the effective social media response strategies that brands can use. Through secondary data analysis on Twitter and two randomized experiments, we find that social justice activism and brand type (low communal, high communal) interact to affect consumers' brand evaluations. In online contexts that feature social justice activism, consumers evaluate high (vs. low) communal brands less favorably. Yet, in online contexts devoid of social justice activism, these evaluation differences are attenuated. We attribute these findings to differences in the extent to which high versus low communal brands are perceived to comply with relationship norms in a social justice activism context. We show that such differences can be attenuated when brands utilize a high empathy response on social media to engage in social justice conversations. Our findings contribute to the literature on social justice and IS, brand relationships, and crisis communication.
翻译:品牌正面临来自消费者通过社交媒体渠道解决社会正义问题的更大压力。然而,对于品牌是否以及如何在网上进行这种对话,几乎没有提供指导意见。我们使用多纪律、多数据和多方法的方法来澄清社会正义活动影响消费者品牌评价的条件,以及品牌可以使用的有效的社交媒体应对战略。我们通过在Twitter上进行二级数据分析和两次随机实验发现,社会正义活动和品牌类型(低社区、高社区)互动影响消费者的品牌评价。在以社会正义活动为特点的网上环境中,消费者对高(或低)社区品牌的评价不那么有利。然而,在缺乏社会正义活动的情况下,这些评价差异缩小了。我们将这些发现归因于高与低社区品牌在社会公正活动背景下被认为符合关系规范的程度的差异。我们表明,当品牌利用社会媒体的高度同情反应参与社会正义对话时,这种差异是可以缩小的。我们的调查结果有助于关于社会正义的文献以及IS、品牌关系和危机通信。