Scientists and inventors around the world are more plentiful and interconnected today than ever before. But while there are more people making discoveries, and more ideas that can be reconfigured in novel ways, research suggests that new ideas are getting harder to find-contradicting recombinant growth theory. In this paper, we shed new light on this apparent puzzle. Analyzing 20 million research articles and 4 million patent applications across the globe over the past half-century, we begin by documenting the rise of remote collaboration across cities, underlining the growing interconnectedness of scientists and inventors globally. We further show that across all fields, periods, and team sizes, researchers in these remote teams are consistently less likely to make breakthrough discoveries relative to their onsite counterparts. Using novel datasets that allow us to explore the division of labor within teams and across space, we find that among distributed team members, collaboration centers on late-stage, technical tasks, like collecting and analyzing data. Yet they are less likely to join forces in conceptual tasks, such as conceiving new ideas and designing research. We conclude that despite striking improvements in digital technology in recent years, remote teams are less likely to integrate the knowledge of their members to produce new, disruptive ideas.
翻译:世界各地的科学家和发明家今天比以往任何时候都更加丰富和相互联系。 但是,虽然现在有更多的人进行发现,更多的想法可以以新的方式进行重组,但研究表明,新的想法越来越难找到相矛盾的再组合增长理论。在本文中,我们对这一显而易见的难题提出了新的见解。在过去半个世纪中,我们分析了全球2 000万篇研究文章和400万份专利申请,首先记录了城市间远程合作的兴起,强调了全球科学家和发明家之间日益扩大的相互联系。我们进一步表明,在所有领域、时期和团队规模中,这些远程团队的研究人员总是不太可能在与现场同行相比实现突破性发现。我们利用新的数据集来探索团队内部和跨空间的分工。我们发现,在分布的团队成员中,合作中心位于后期,技术任务,如收集和分析数据。然而,他们不太可能加入概念性任务,例如构思新想法和设计研究等。我们的结论是,尽管近年来数字技术的显著改进,但远程团队的研究人员往往不会产生新的想法。