In many developing countries, the total electricity demand is larger than the limited generation capacity of power stations. Many countries adopt the common practice of routine load shedding - disconnecting entire regions from the power supply - to maintain a balance between demand and supply. Load shedding results in inflicting hardship and discomfort on households, which is even worse and hence unfair to those whose need for electricity is higher than that of others during load shedding hours. Recently, Oluwasuji et al. [2020] presented this problem and suggested several heuristic solutions. In this work, we study the electricity distribution problem as a problem of fair division, model it using the related literature on cake-cutting problems, and discuss some insights on which parts of the time intervals are allocated to each household. We consider four cases: identical demand, uniform utilities; identical demand, additive utilities; different demand, uniform utilities; different demand, additive utilities. We provide the solution for the first two cases and discuss the novel concept of q-times bin packing in relation to the remaining cases. We also show how the fourth case is related to the consensus k-division problem. One can study objectives and constraints using utilitarian and egalitarian social welfare metrics, as well as trying to keep the number of cuts as small as possible. A secondary objective can be to minimize the maximum utility-difference between agents.
翻译:在许多发展中国家,电力总需求大于发电站发电能力有限的发电能力。许多国家都采用例行负荷消减的常见做法,即将整个区域与电力供应脱钩,以保持供需平衡;使家庭陷入艰苦和不舒适,甚至更糟糕,因此对在负载停产时对电力需求高于其他人的家庭来说不公平。最近,Oluwasuji等人(2020年)提出了这一问题,并提出了若干超速的解决办法。在这项工作中,我们研究电力分配问题,将其作为一个公平分工问题,用有关切蛋糕问题的文献为它做模型,并讨论一些关于每个家庭分配时间间隔中哪些部分的见解。我们考虑四个案例:相同的需求、统一的公用事业;相同的需求、添加的公用事业;不同的需求、统一的公用事业;不同的需求、添加的公用事业。我们为前两个案例提供解决办法,并讨论与剩余案例相关的新颖的平时包装概念。我们还展示了第四个案例与协商一致的 kdivis问题相关联,它使用有关蛋糕切问题的相关文献,并讨论一些关于每个家庭分配时间间隔时间间隔期中哪些部分分配问题的见解。我们可以研究四个案例:相同的需求、统一的公用事业、相同的公用事业、相同的公用事业、相同的公用事业、相同的公用事业和可能作为衡量工具的代理人之间的最大程度。