Sentic computing relies on well-defined affective models of different complexity - polarity to distinguish positive and negative sentiment, for example, or more nuanced models to capture expressions of human emotions. When used to measure communication success, even the most granular affective model combined with sophisticated machine learning approaches may not fully capture an organisation's strategic positioning goals. Such goals often deviate from the assumptions of standardised affective models. While certain emotions such as Joy and Trust typically represent desirable brand associations, specific communication goals formulated by marketing professionals often go beyond such standard dimensions. For instance, the brand manager of a television show may consider fear or sadness to be desired emotions for its audience. This article introduces expansion techniques for affective models, combining common and commonsense knowledge available in knowledge graphs with language models and affective reasoning, improving coverage and consistency as well as supporting domain-specific interpretations of emotions. An extensive evaluation compares the performance of different expansion techniques: (i) a quantitative evaluation based on the revisited Hourglass of Emotions model to assess performance on complex models that cover multiple affective categories, using manually compiled gold standard data, and (ii) a qualitative evaluation of a domain-specific affective model for television programme brands. The results of these evaluations demonstrate that the introduced techniques support a variety of embeddings and pre-trained models. The paper concludes with a discussion on applying this approach to other scenarios where affective model resources are scarce.
翻译:感官计算依赖于不同复杂程度的明确界定的情感模型 -- -- 分辨积极和消极情绪的极性,或更细微的模型,以捕捉人类情感的表现形式。当用来衡量交流成功时,即使是最颗粒的情感模型,再加上先进的机器学习方法,也可能无法完全掌握一个组织的战略定位目标。这些目标往往与标准化的情感模型的假设不同。一些情感,如喜悦和信任,通常代表着理想的品牌协会,而营销专业人员制定的具体沟通目标往往超越了这种标准层面。例如,电视节目的品牌经理可能认为恐惧或悲伤是观众所希望的情感。文章介绍了情感模型的扩展技术,将知识图中现有的共同和常识知识与语言模型以及影响推理相结合,改进覆盖面和一致性,并支持对情绪的局部解释。广泛评价比较了不同的扩展技术的绩效:(一) 以重新审视的情感闪光模型为基础,评估包括多种影响类别的复杂模型的绩效,使用人工编译的黄金标准数据,以及(二) 文章的品牌模型的质量评估,将这种特定影响性模型用于对具体区域背景评估的模型的排序。