Tools and methods for automatic image segmentation are rapidly developing, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. While these methods are designed to be as general as possible, there are no guarantees for their performance on new data. The choice between methods is usually based on benchmark performance whereas the data in the benchmark can be significantly different than that of the user. We introduce a novel Deep Learning method which, given an image and a proposed corresponding segmentation, obtained by any method, estimates the Intersection over Union measure (IoU) with respect to the unknown ground truth. We refer to this method as a Quality Assurance Network -- QANet. The QANet is designed to give the user an estimate of the segmentation quality on the users own, private, data without the need for human inspection or labeling. It is based on the RibCage Network architecture, originally proposed as a discriminator in an adversarial network framework. The QANet was trained on simulated data with synthesized segmentations and was tested on real cell images and segmentations obtained by three different automatic methods as submitted to the Cell Segmentation Benchmark. We show that the QANet's predictions of the IoU scores accurately estimates to the IoU scores evaluated by the benchmark organizers based on the ground truth segmentation.
翻译:自动图像分解工具和方法正在迅速发展,每个工具和方法都有其自身的优点和弱点。这些方法设计得尽可能笼统,但无法保证其在新数据方面的性能。两种方法的选择通常基于基准性能,而基准中的数据可能与用户的数据大不相同。我们采用了一种新的深学习方法,根据图像和拟议的相应分解方法,以任何方法获得的方法,在未知的地面真相方面估计了欧盟措施的交叉性(IoU),我们把这一方法称为质量保证网络 -- -- QANet。QANet旨在向用户提供用户自己、私人的分解质量估计,而不需要人类的检查或标签。我们采用了RibCage网络结构,最初以对抗网络框架中的制导师为名,对QANet进行了模拟数据的培训,并用提交细胞分解基准的三种不同自动方法获得的细胞图象和分解。我们显示,QANet根据I的测得分数对I的准确的测得分数进行了评估。我们显示,QANet根据I的测测测得的I的I的地面分评。