Technology plays a crucial role in people's lives. However, software engineering discriminates against individuals from underrepresented groups in several ways, either through algorithms that produce biased outcomes or for the lack of diversity and inclusion in software development environments and academic courses focused on technology. This reality contradicts the history of software engineering, which is filled with outstanding scientists from underrepresented groups who changed the world with their contributions to the field. Ada Lovelace, Alan Turing, and Clarence Ellis are only some individuals who made significant breakthroughs in the area and belonged to the population that is so underrepresented in undergraduate courses and the software industry. Previous research discusses that women, LGBTQIA+ people, and non-white individuals are examples of students who often feel unwelcome and ostracized in software engineering. However, do they know about the remarkable scientists that came before them and that share background similarities with them? Can we use these scientists as role models to motivate these students to continue pursuing a career in software engineering? In this study, we present the preliminary results of a survey with 128 undergraduate students about this topic. Our findings demonstrate that students' knowledge of computer scientists from underrepresented groups is limited. This creates opportunities for investigations on fostering diversity in software engineering courses using strategies exploring computer science's history.
翻译:然而,软件工程以多种方式歧视代表性不足的群体的个人,要么是通过产生偏差结果的算法,要么是由于缺乏多样性和融入软件开发环境和侧重于技术的学术课程。这一现实与软件工程史相矛盾,因为软件工程史上充满了来自代表性不足的群体的杰出科学家,他们以对实地的贡献改变了世界。Ada Lovelace、Alan Turing和Clarence Ellis只是一些在这一领域取得重大突破的人,他们属于本科课程和软件行业中代表性极低的人口。先前的研究讨论了妇女、男女同性恋、双性恋、双性恋和变性者以及非白人个人经常感到软件工程不受欢迎和排斥。然而,他们是否知道他们面前的杰出科学家及其背景相似之处?我们能否利用这些科学家作为榜样来激励这些学生继续从事软件工程职业?在这个研究中,我们向128名本科学生介绍关于这个题目的调查的初步结果。我们的研究结果表明,学生对来自代表性不足群体的计算机科学家的知识有限,他们在软件工程中常常感到不受欢迎的和被排斥。</s>