Using the Shapes Constraint Language for modelling regulatory requirements

Ontologies are traditionally expressed in the Web Ontology Language (OWL), that provides a syntax for expressing taxonomies with axioms regulating class membership. The semantics of OWL, based on Description Logic (DL), allows for the use of automated reasoning to check the consistency of ontologies, perform classification, and to answer DL queries. However, the open world assumption of OWL, along with limitations in its expressiveness, makes OWL less suitable for modelling rules and regulations, used in public administration. In such cases, it is desirable to have closed world semantics and a rule-based engine to check compliance with regulations. In this paper we describe and discuss data model management using the Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL), for concept modelling of concrete requirements in regulation documents within the public sector. We show how complex regulations, often containing a number of alternative requirements, can be expressed as constraints, and the utility of SHACL engines in verification of instance data against the SHACL model. We discuss benefits of modelling with SHACL, compared to OWL, and demonstrate the maintainability of the SHACL model by domain experts without prior knowledge of ontology management.