Conscious states (states that there is something it is like to be in) seem both rich or full of detail, and ineffable or hard to fully describe or recall. The problem of ineffability, in particular, is a longstanding issue in philosophy that partly motivates the explanatory gap: the belief that consciousness cannot be reduced to underlying physical processes. Here, we provide an information theoretic dynamical systems perspective on the richness and ineffability of consciousness. In our framework, the richness of conscious experience corresponds to the amount of information in a conscious state and ineffability corresponds to the amount of information lost at different stages of processing. We describe how attractor dynamics in working memory would induce impoverished recollections of our original experiences, how the discrete symbolic nature of language is insufficient for describing the rich and high-dimensional structure of experiences, and how similarity in the cognitive function of two individuals relates to improved communicability of their experiences to each other. While our model may not settle all questions relating to the explanatory gap, it makes progress toward a fully physicalist explanation of the richness and ineffability of conscious experience: two important aspects that seem to be part of what makes qualitative character so puzzling.
翻译:意识状态(存在某种感受的状态)似乎既充满细节又难以完全描述或回忆起。特别是,言不尽之难是哲学上长期存在的问题,这部分推动了解释鸿沟:即意识不能简化为底层物理过程的信念。在这里,我们提供了一个关于意识的信息论动力系统视角,来说明意识的丰富性和言不尽之难。在我们的框架中,意识体验的丰富性对应于意识状态中的信息量,而言不尽之难则对应于不同处理阶段丢失的信息量。我们描述了工作记忆中吸引子动力学如何导致我们对原始体验的贫瘠回忆,语言的离散符号本质不足以描述体验的丰富和高维结构,以及两个人认知功能的相似性如何与彼此的经验交流能力相关。虽然我们的模型可能无法解决与解释鸿沟相关的所有问题,但它在向富有物理意义的解释意识体验的丰富性和言不尽之难的目标上取得了进展:这两个方面似乎是确定性质如此令人困惑的部分。