Online platforms are an increasingly popular tool for people to produce, promote or sell their work. However recent studies indicate that social disparities and biases present in the real world might transfer to online platforms and could be exacerbated by seemingly harmless design choices on the site (e.g., recommendation systems or publicly visible success measures). In this paper we analyze an exclusive online community of teams of design professionals called Dribbble and investigate apparent differences in outcomes by gender. Overall, we find that men produce more work, and are able to show it to a larger audience thus receiving more likes. Some of this effect can be explained by the fact that women have different skills and design different images. Most importantly however, women and men position themselves differently in the Dribbble community. Our investigation of users' position in the social network shows that women have more clustered and gender homophilous following relations, which leads them to have smaller and more closely knit social networks. Overall, our study demonstrates that looking behind the apparent patterns of gender inequalities in online markets with the help of social networks and product differentiation helps us to better understand gender differences in success and failure.
翻译:然而,最近的研究表明,现实世界中存在的社会差异和偏见可能会转移到在线平台,而且可能因为网站上似乎无害的设计选择(例如推荐系统或公开可见的成功措施)而加剧。 在本文中,我们分析了一个由设计专业人员组成的独家在线社区,他们称为Dribbble,调查基于性别的明显结果差异。总体而言,我们发现,男性生产更多的工作,并且能够向更多的受众展示工作,从而获得更多相似的节目。一些效果可以解释为妇女拥有不同的技能和设计不同的图像。但最重要的是,妇女和男子在Dribbbble社区的地位不同。我们对用户在社会网络中的地位的调查表明,在关系之后,妇女拥有更多的集群和性别同性,导致她们拥有更小、更紧密的社会网络。总体而言,我们的研究表明,在社会网络和产品差异的帮助下,在网上市场中寻找明显的性别不平等模式有助于我们更好地了解在成败方面的性别差异。