This paper analyzes the joint assessment of quality, spatial and social presence, empathy, attitude, and attention in three conditions: (A)visualizing and rating the quality of contents in a Head-Mounted Display (HMD), (B)visualizing the contents in an HMD,and (C)visualizing the contents in an HMD where participants can see their hands and take notes. The experiment simulates an immersive communication where participants attend conversations of different genres and from different acquisition perspectives in the context of international experiences. Video quality is evaluated with Single-Stimulus Discrete Quality Evaluation (SSDQE) methodology. Spatial and social presence are evaluated with questionnaires adapted from the literature. Initial empathy is assessed with Interpersonal Reactivity Index(IRI) and a questionnaire is designed to evaluate attitude. Attention is evaluated with 3 questions that had pass/fail answers. 54 participants were evenly distributed among A, B, and C conditions taking into account their international experience backgrounds, obtaining a diverse sample of participants. The results from the subjective test validate the proposed methodology in VR communications, showing that video quality experiments can be adapted to conditions imposed by experiments focused on the evaluation of socioemotional features in terms of contents of long-duration, actor and observer acquisition perspectives, and genre. In addition, the positive results related to the sense of presence imply that technology can be relevant in the analyzed use case. The acquisition perspective greatly influences social presence and all the contents have a positive impact on all participants on their attitude towards international experiences. The annotated dataset, Student Experiences Around the World dataset (SEAW-dataset), obtained from the experiment is made publicly available.
翻译:本文分析了在三个条件下对质量、空间和社会存在、同情、态度和关注进行联合评估的质量、空间和社会存在、同情、态度和关注三个条件:(A) 以 " 高调 " 显示(HMD)对内容质量进行视觉和评级,(B) 以 " 高调 " 显示(HMD)对内容进行视觉和评级,(C) 以 " 高调 " 显示内容对内容进行视觉和评分,(C) 以 " 高调 " 显示(SDQE)对内容的质量进行评估,(A) 以 " 高调(HMD) " 显示(HMD)显示)显示和 " 质量 " 质量 " 质量和 " 质量 " 质量 " 质量 " (SDQE)评价 " 方法对内容的质量进行评估,(B) 以 " 高调 " 显示 " 高调 " 质量 " 显示(SDQE)显示 " 显示 " 空间和社会存在 " 质量 " 质量 " 质量 " 质量 " 质量 " 质量 " 质量 " 质量 " 质量 " 质量 " 态度, " 显示 " 参与者最初影响, " 初步 " 评估旨在评价3 " 注意 " ; " 注意 " ; " 注意 " 有 " ; " 透明 " 以 " 透明 " 以 " 透明 " ; " 透明性 " ; " 显示 " 显示 " 显示 " ; " 高调的 " 高调的 " ; " 以 " 高调的 " ; " 高调,以 " ; " 高调的 " 高调,以 " 高调的 " 高调为 " ; " ; " 高调的 " ; " ; " ; " ; " ; " ; " ; " ; " 高调, " 高调,以 " 高调 " 高调; " 高调; " ; " ; " ; " ; " 以 " ; " ; " ; " ; " ; " 高调 " 以 " 高调; " 高调; " 高调; " 高调; " ; "