When subjected to a sudden, unanticipated threat, human groups characteristically self-organize to identify the threat, determine potential responses, and act to reduce its impact. Central to this process is the challenge of coordinating information sharing and response activity within a disrupted environment. In this paper, we consider coordination in the context of responses to the 2001 World Trade Center disaster. Using records of communications among 17 organizational units, we examine the mechanisms driving communication dynamics, with an emphasis on the emergence of coordinating roles. We employ relational event models (REMs) to identify the mechanisms shaping communications in each unit, finding a consistent pattern of behavior across units with very different characteristics. Using a simulation-based "knock-out" study, we also probe the importance of different mechanisms for hub formation. Our results suggest that, while preferential attachment and pre-disaster role structure generally contribute to the emergence of hub structure, temporally local conversational norms play a much larger role. We discuss broader implications for the role of microdynamics in driving macroscopic outcomes, and for the emergence of coordination in other settings.
翻译:当受到突然、意外的威胁时,人类群体具有自我组织的特点,以辨别威胁,确定潜在反应,并采取行动减少其影响。这一过程的核心是协调在中断的环境中的信息共享和应对活动。在本文件中,我们考虑在应对2001年世界贸易中心灾害时进行协调。我们利用17个组织单位之间的通信记录,审查推动通信动态的机制,强调协调作用的出现。我们使用关联事件模型(REMs)来确定影响每个单位通信的机制,找出具有非常不同特点的单位之间一致的行为模式。我们利用模拟的“退出”研究,还探讨不同枢纽形成机制的重要性。我们的结果表明,尽管优惠的附属和灾前作用结构通常有助于枢纽结构的出现,但时间性的当地对话规范的作用要大得多。我们讨论了微动力在驱动宏观结果和在其他环境中出现协调方面的作用的更广泛影响。