Environmental model performances need to be assessed using some statistical parameters, such as mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The advantages and disadvantages of these parameters are still in controversial. The purpose of this study is to introduce a statistical parameter, type A uncertainty (UA), into model performance evaluations. We particularly focus on the relations between sample sizes and three evaluation parameters, and tested a few ocean color remote sensing algorithms and datasets. The results indicate that RMSE, MAE and UA all vary with the sample size n but present different trends. Based on our tested results and theoretical analysis, we therefore conclude that UA is better than RMSE and MAE to express model uncertainty, because its downward trends indicate that the more samples we take, the less uncertainty we get. RMSE and MAE are good parameters for assessing model accuracy rather than uncertainty.
翻译:环境模型的性能需要使用某些统计参数进行评估,如平均绝对误差(MAE)和根平均值正方差(RMSE)等。这些参数的利弊仍然有争议。本研究的目的是将A型不确定性(UA)的统计参数引入模型性能评估。我们特别侧重于抽样大小和三个评价参数之间的关系,测试了一些海洋颜色遥感算法和数据集。结果显示,RMSE、MAE和UA都与样本大小(n)不同,但目前的趋势不同。根据我们测试的结果和理论分析,我们认为UA优于RME和MAE, 以表达模型性能不确定性,因为其下行趋势表明我们采取的样品越多,不确定性就越少。RME和MAE是评估模型准确性而非不确定性的良好参数。