Despite increasing interest in the field of Interpretable Machine Learning (IML), a significant gap persists between the technical objectives targeted by researchers' methods and the high-level goals of consumers' use cases. In this work, we synthesize foundational work on IML methods and evaluation into an actionable taxonomy. This taxonomy serves as a tool to conceptualize the gap between researchers and consumers, illustrated by the lack of connections between its methods and use cases components. It also provides the foundation from which we describe a three-step workflow to better enable researchers and consumers to work together to discover what types of methods are useful for what use cases. Eventually, by building on the results generated from this workflow, a more complete version of the taxonomy will increasingly allow consumers to find relevant methods for their target use cases and researchers to identify applicable use cases for their proposed methods.
翻译:尽管人们对可解释机器学习领域的兴趣日益浓厚,但研究人员方法所针对的技术目标与消费者使用案例的高级目标之间仍然存在巨大差距。在这项工作中,我们把关于可操作的分类法方法和评价的基本工作综合成可操作的分类法。这种分类法是将研究人员与消费者之间的差距概念化的工具,其方法和使用案例组成部分之间缺乏联系就说明了这一点。它还提供了我们描述一个三步工作流程的基础,以便我们从中描述一个三步工作流程,使研究人员和消费者能够共同努力,发现哪些类型的方法对案件有用。最终,通过利用这一工作流程产生的结果,更加完整的分类法将日益使消费者找到其目标使用案例的相关方法,并使研究人员能够查明其拟议方法的适用案例。