The August 2022 special election for U.S. House Representative in Alaska featured three main candidates and was conducted by by single-winner ranked choice voting method known as ``instant runoff voting." The results of this election displayed a well-known but relatively rare phenomenon known as the ``center squeeze:" The most centrist candidate, Mark Begich, was eliminated in the first round despite winning an overwhelming majority of second-place votes. In fact, Begich was the {\em Condorcet winner} of this election: Based on the cast vote record, he would have defeated both of the other two candidates in head-to-head contests, but he was eliminated in the first round of ballot counting due to receiving the fewest first-place votes. The purpose of this paper is to use the data in the cast vote record to explore the range of likely outcomes if this election had been conducted under two alternative voting methods: Approval Voting and STAR (``Score Then Automatic Runoff") Voting. We find that under the best assumptions available about voter behavior, the most likely outcomes are that Peltola would still have won the election under Approval Voting, while Begich would have won under STAR Voting.
翻译:2022年8月在阿拉斯加举行的美国众议院代表特别选举有三个主要候选人参加。选举结果显示,“中央挤压”是一个众所周知但相对罕见的现象:“中央挤压 ” : “ 最中间派候选人马克·贝吉奇在第一轮投票中被淘汰,尽管赢得了二等选票的压倒性多数。 事实上,贝吉奇是这次选举的获选者:根据投票记录,他本可以击败另外两名候选人参加头对头的竞选,但在第一轮计票时中,他因获得最多第一票而被淘汰。 本文的目的是利用投票记录中的数据来探索如果这次选举是在两种备选投票方法下进行的,那么可能的结果的范围: 核准投票和STAR(“最核心的”和“自动决胜”)投票。 我们发现,根据关于选民行为的最佳假设,最有可能的结果是,在第一轮投票中,佩尔托拉仍然在Stal投票中获胜,而在Starch获胜。</s>