In this study, we analyze an advertising competition in a duopoly. We consider two different notions of equilibrium. We model the companies in the duopoly as major players, and the consumers as minor players. In our first game model we identify Nash Equilibria (NE) between all the players. Next we frame the model to lead to the search for Multi-Leader-Follower Nash Equilibria (MLF-NE). This approach is reminiscent of Stackelberg games in the sense that the major players design their advertisement policies assuming that the minor players are rational and settle in a Nash Equilibrium among themselves. This rationality assumption reduces the competition between the major players to a 2-player game. After solving these two models for the notions of equilibrium, we analyze the similarities and differences of the two different sets of equilibria.
翻译:在此研究中,我们分析广告竞争,我们考虑两种不同的均衡概念。我们把双极公司作为主要角色,把消费者作为次要角色。在第一个游戏模型中,我们辨别了所有参与者之间的Nash Equilibria(NE)。接下来,我们设置了模型,以导致寻找多层领导-追随者Nash Equilibria(MLF-NE)。这个方法使人想起了斯塔克尔贝格游戏,因为主要参与者设计了自己的广告政策,假设次要角色是理性的,他们彼此之间在纳什平衡中定居。这一理性假设将主要参与者之间的竞争减为二层玩家游戏。在解决了这两种平衡概念的模式之后,我们分析了两种不同的平衡概念的相似性和差异。