Modern information and communication technology practices present novel threats to privacy. This paper focuses on some shortcomings in current privacy and data protection regulations' ability to adequately address the ramifications of some AI-driven data processing practices, in particular where data sets are combined and processed by AI systems. We raise attention to two regulatory anomalies related to two fundamental assumptions underlying traditional privacy and data protection approaches: (1) Only personally identifiable information (PII)/personal data require privacy protection: Privacy and data protection regulations are only triggered with respect to PII/personal data, but not anonymous data. This is not only problematic because determining whether data falls in the former or latter category is no longer straightforward, but also because privacy risks associated with data processing may exist whether or not an individual can be identified. (2) Given sufficient information provided in a transparent and understandable manner, individuals are able to adequately assess the privacy implications of their actions and protect their privacy interests: We show that this assumption corresponds to the current societal consensus on privacy protection. However, relying on human privacy expectations fails to address some important privacy threats, because those expectations are increasingly at odds with the actual privacy implications of data processing practices, as most people lack the necessary technical literacy to understand the sophisticated technologies at play, not to mention correctly assess their privacy implications.
翻译:本文着重论述当前隐私和数据保护条例在适当处理一些AI驱动的数据处理做法的影响方面存在的一些缺陷,特别是如果数据集由AI系统合并和处理,我们提请注意与传统隐私和数据保护方法所依据的两个基本假设有关的两种监管异常现象:(1) 只有个人可识别的信息(PII)/个人数据才要求保护隐私:隐私和数据保护条例仅针对PII/个人数据,而不是匿名数据。这不仅因为确定数据属于前者还是后者类别不再直接直接存在,而且还因为与数据处理有关的隐私风险可能存在,无论个人能否被识别。 (2) 鉴于以透明和易懂的方式提供的充足信息,个人能够充分评估其行动的隐私影响并保护其隐私利益:我们表明这一假设符合目前关于隐私保护的社会共识:隐私和数据保护条例仅仅针对PII/个人数据,而不是匿名数据。但是,由于这些期望与数据处理做法的实际隐私影响越来越不相符合,因此这些期望与数据处理做法的实际隐私影响越来越相矛盾,因为大多数人缺乏必要的技术知识知识来正确评估其复杂的隐私影响。