This paper investigates the impact of pre-existing offline data on online learning, in the context of dynamic pricing. We study a single-product dynamic pricing problem over a selling horizon of $T$ periods. The demand in each period is determined by the price of the product according to a linear demand model with unknown parameters. We assume that before the start of the selling horizon, the seller already has some pre-existing offline data. The offline data set contains $n$ samples, each of which is an input-output pair consisting of a historical price and an associated demand observation. The seller wants to utilize both the pre-existing offline data and the sequential online data to minimize the regret of the online learning process. We characterize the joint effect of the size, location and dispersion of the offline data on the optimal regret of the online learning process. Specifically, the size, location and dispersion of the offline data are measured by the number of historical samples $n$, the distance between the average historical price and the optimal price $\delta$, and the standard deviation of the historical prices $\sigma$, respectively. We show that the optimal regret is $\widetilde \Theta\left(\sqrt{T}\wedge \frac{T}{(n\wedge T)\delta^2+n\sigma^2}\right)$, and design a learning algorithm based on the "optimism in the face of uncertainty" principle, whose regret is optimal up to a logarithmic factor. Our results reveal surprising transformations of the optimal regret rate with respect to the size of the offline data, which we refer to as phase transitions. In addition, our results demonstrate that the location and dispersion of the offline data also have an intrinsic effect on the optimal regret, and we quantify this effect via the inverse-square law.
翻译:本文在动态定价的背景下, 调查先前存在的离线数据对在线学习的影响。 我们想在销售期的美元范围内, 研究一个单一产品动态定价问题。 每个时期的需求由产品的价格根据线性需求模型和未知参数确定。 我们假设在销售期开始前, 卖方已经有一些先前存在的离线数据。 离线数据集包含美元样本, 每个样本都是由历史价格和相关需求观测组成的投入- 产出对配对。 卖方想要在销售期的美元范围内, 研究一个原存在的离线数据动态定价问题。 每个时期的需求都由产品的价格根据线性需求模型确定。 我们的离线性需求模型的大小、 位置和分散效应是根据历史样本数量测量的。 平均历史价格和最佳价格之间的距离 $\delta美元, 以及历史价格的标准偏离 $\sgrima$, 我们的离线性结果显示, 我们的离线性数据转换率 以美元==