Do we really understand how machine classifies art styles? Historically, art is perceived and interpreted by human eyes and there are always controversial discussions over how people identify and understand art. Historians and general public tend to interpret the subject matter of art through the context of history and social factors. Style, however, is different from subject matter. Given the fact that Style does not correspond to the existence of certain objects in the painting and is mainly related to the form and can be correlated with features at different levels.(Ahmed Elgammal et al. 2018), which makes the identification and classification of the characteristics artwork's style and the "transition" - how it flows and evolves - remains as a challenge for both human and machine. In this work, a series of state-of-art neural networks and manifold learning algorithms are explored to unveil this intriguing topic: How does machine capture and interpret the flow of Art History?
翻译:我们真的理解机器如何分类艺术风格吗?从历史上看,艺术被人类的眼睛所认识和解释,而且人们如何识别和理解艺术总是有争议性的讨论。历史学家和一般公众往往通过历史和社会因素来解释艺术主题。但是,风格与主题事项不同。鉴于System与绘画中某些物件的存在并不相符,主要与形式有关,并且可以与不同层次的特征相关。 (Ahmedd Elgammal等人,2018年),这使得艺术风格和“转型”的特征的识别和分类 — — 它如何流动和演变 — — 仍然是人类和机器面临的一个挑战。在这项工作中,探索了一系列最先进的神经网络和多重学习算法来揭开这个令人感兴趣的话题:机器如何捕捉和解释艺术历史的流程?