Background: The Expected Value of Sample Information (EVSI) calculates the value of collecting additional information through a study with a given design. Standard EVSI analyses assume that the treatment recommendations based on the new information will be implemented immediately and completely once the study has finished. However, treatment implementation is often slow and incomplete, giving a biased estimation of the study value. Previous methods have adjusted for this bias, but they typically make the unrealistic assumption that the study outcomes do not impact the implementation. One method does assume that the implementation is related to the strength of evidence in favour of the treatment but this method uses analytical results, which require alternative restrictive assumptions. Methods: We develop two implementation-adjusted EVSI calculation methods that relax these assumptions. The first method uses computationally demanding nested simulations, using the definition of the implementation-adjusted EVSI. The second method aims to facilitate the computation by adapting a recently developed efficient EVSI computation method to adjust for imperfect implementation. The implementation-adjusted EVSI is then calculated with the two methods across three examples. Results: The maximum difference between the two methods is at most 6% in all examples. The efficient computation method is between 6 and 60 times faster than the nested simulation method in this case study and could be used in practice. Conclusions: The methods developed in this paper calculate implementation-adjusted EVSI using realistic assumptions. The efficient estimation method is accurate and can estimate the implementation-adjusted EVSI in practice. By adapting standard EVSI estimation methods, we allow accurate adjustments for imperfect implementation with the same computational cost as a standard analysis.
翻译:抽样信息的预期值(EVSI)根据特定设计进行的一项研究计算了收集额外信息的价值。标准EVSI分析假定,根据新信息提出的处理建议将在研究完成后立即完全执行。然而,处理执行过程往往缓慢且不完整,对研究价值的估算有偏差。以前的方法已经对这一偏差作了调整,但通常会作出不切实际的假设,认为研究的结果不会影响执行。一种方法确实假定,执行过程与有利于治疗的证据的力度有关,但这种方法使用的分析结果需要替代性限制性假设。方法:我们开发了两种经执行调整的EVSI计算方法,以放松这些假设。第一种方法使用经执行调整的EVSI定义,要求进行嵌套式模拟。第二种方法的目的是便利进行计算,即根据最近开发的有效的EVSI计算方法进行调整,以适应不完善执行过程。随后,执行调整的EVSI采用两种方法进行计算。结果:两种方法之间的最大差异在所有例子中都是6 %。有效的计算方法是,通过实际的计算方法,我们采用这一标准性评估方法的计算方法,采用比纸质的计算方法更快。