Trust calibration is necessary to ensure appropriate user acceptance in advanced automation technologies. A significant challenge to achieve trust calibration is to quantitatively estimate human trust in real-time. Although multiple trust models exist, these models have limited predictive performance partly due to individual differences in trust dynamics. A personalized model for each person can address this issue, but it requires a significant amount of data for each user. We present a methodology to develop customized model by clustering humans based on their trust dynamics. The clustering-based method addresses the individual differences in trust dynamics while requiring significantly less data than personalized model. We show that our clustering-based customized models not only outperform the general model based on entire population, but also outperform simple demographic factor-based customized models. Specifically, we propose that two models based on ``confident'' and ``skeptical'' group of participants, respectively, can represent the trust behavior of the population. The ``confident'' participants, as compared to the ``skeptical'' participants, have higher initial trust levels, lose trust slower when they encounter low reliability operations, and have higher trust levels during trust-repair after the low reliability operations. In summary, clustering-based customized models improve trust prediction performance for further trust calibration considerations.
翻译:为确保用户对先进自动化技术的适当接受,信任校准是必要的。实现信任校准的一个重大挑战是量化地估计实时人类信任度。虽然存在多种信任模式,但这些模型的预测性性能有限,部分原因是个人信任动态的差异。每个个人个性化模型可以解决这个问题,但每个用户都需要大量数据。我们提出了一个方法,通过根据信任动态将人聚在一起来开发定制模型。基于集群的方法解决了个人信任动态的差异,同时比个人化模型需要的数据要少得多。我们显示,我们基于集群的定制模型不仅比基于整个人口的一般模型要差,而且比基于人口的一般模型也差。具体地说,我们提议,基于 " 互信" 和“偏执”参与者组的两种模式可以分别代表民众的信任行为。与“怀疑”参与者相比,“怀疑”参与者的初始信任水平更高,当他们遇到低可靠性操作时,信任度更低,而且信任度更低的模型在信任-精确度预测后,信任度性能调整性能调调调调调调的模型。