This study attempted to develop fair, relevant, and content-valid assessment tools for capstone project courses. Toward this goal, new rating instruments based on the concept of rubrics were proposed. To ensure that the new instruments were valid and fair, several meetings with faculty and students of the computing science departments (i.e., Computer Science and Information Technology) were successively conducted. Eight faculty members and 10 students participated in the study. The final versions of the instruments were completed after a series of careful deliberations with faculty and students. Faculty and students perceived the new instruments fairer than the previous ones. Since the final instruments will be deployed this semester, their strengths and weaknesses are not yet known at this time. Directions for future research are presented.
翻译:这项研究试图为顶点项目课程开发公平、相关和内容有效评估工具; 为实现这一目标,提出了基于标志概念的新评级工具; 为确保新工具的有效性和公正性,连续与计算机科学系(即计算机科学和信息技术系)的教职员工和学生举行了几次会议; 8名教职员工和10名学生参加了研究; 与教职员工和学生进行了一系列认真讨论之后,完成了文书的最后版本; 教职员工和学生认为新工具比以往更公平; 由于本学期将部署最后工具,因此目前尚不知道其优缺点; 提出了今后研究的方向。