We consider Group Control by Adding Individuals (GCAI) in the setting of group identification for two procedural rules -- the consensus-start-respecting rule and the liberal-start-respecting rule. It is known that GCAI for both rules are NP-hard, but whether they are fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the number of distinguished individuals remained open. We resolve both open problems in the affirmative. In addition, we strengthen the NP-hardness of GCAI by showing that, with respect to the natural parameter the number of added individuals, GCAI for both rules are W[2]-hard. Notably, the W[2]-hardness for the liberal-start-respecting rule holds even when restricted to a very special case where the qualifications of individuals satisfy the so-called consecutive ones property. However, for the consensus-start-respecting rule, the problem becomes polynomial-time solvable in this special case. We also study a dual restriction where the disqualifications of individuals fulfill the consecutive ones property, and show that under this restriction GCAI for both rules turn out to be polynomial-time solvable. Our reductions for showing W[2]-hardness also imply several lower bounds concerning kernelization and exact algorithms.
翻译:我们认为,在为两项程序规则 -- -- 协商一致的起动尊重规则和自由的起动尊重规则 -- -- 确定群体身份时,以个人为对象进行群体控制(GCAI)是两种程序规则 -- -- 协商一致的起动尊重规则和自由的起动尊重规则 -- -- 众所周知,对于这两项规则来说,GCAI都是硬硬的,但对于被区别的个人数目而言,它们是否是固定的参数可移动的;我们以肯定的方式解决了这两个尚未解决的问题;此外,我们通过表明在自然参数方面,增加的个人数目是W[2]硬的,加强GCAI的硬性,这两类规则都是W[2]硬性。值得注意的是,自由的起动尊重规则即使限于一个非常特殊的情况,即个人的资格满足了所谓的连续财产的特性,但两者是否都是固定的;然而,就协商一致的起动规则而言,问题就在这个特殊案例中,是多时制的。我们还研究了一种双重限制,即个人不符合连续财产的取消资格,并且根据这项限制,GCAI在这两种规则下都具有多元性-时间的软性硬性,也意味着软性地表明软性地压。