The political stance prediction for news articles has been widely studied to mitigate the echo chamber effect -- people fall into their thoughts and reinforce their pre-existing beliefs. The previous works for the political stance problem focus on (1) identifying political factors that could reflect the political stance of a news article and (2) capturing those factors effectively. Despite their empirical successes, they are not sufficiently justified in terms of how effective their identified factors are in the political stance prediction. Motivated by this, in this work, we conduct a user study to investigate important factors in political stance prediction, and observe that the context and tone of a news article (implicit) and external knowledge for real-world entities appearing in the article (explicit) are important in determining its political stance. Based on this observation, we propose a novel knowledge-aware approach to political stance prediction (KHAN), employing (1) hierarchical attention networks (HAN) to learn the relationships among words and sentences in three different levels and (2) knowledge encoding (KE) to incorporate external knowledge for real-world entities into the process of political stance prediction. Also, to take into account the subtle and important difference between opposite political stances, we build two independent political knowledge graphs (KG) (i.e., KG-lib and KG-con) by ourselves and learn to fuse the different political knowledge. Through extensive evaluations on three real-world datasets, we demonstrate the superiority of DASH in terms of (1) accuracy, (2) efficiency, and (3) effectiveness.
翻译:人们对新闻文章的政治立场预测进行了广泛研究,以缓解回声室效应 -- -- 人们可以思考并强化他们先前的信仰 -- -- 以往的政治立场问题研究的重点是:(1) 查明能够反映新闻文章的政治立场的政治因素,(2) 有效地捕捉这些因素,尽管他们取得了经验上的成功,但在政治立场预测中所查明的因素的效力方面,他们没有足够的理由,因此,我们开展了用户研究,以调查政治立场预测中的重要因素,并注意到文章(隐含的)和外部知识的背景和语调对于文章中真实世界实体(明白的)的背景和语调对于确定其政治立场很重要。基于这一观察,我们提出一种新的了解政治立场预测的知识(汗)方法(汗),利用(1) 等级关注网络(汗)学习三个不同层次的言词和判决之间的关系,(2) 知识编码(肯尼亚)将真实世界实体的外部知识纳入政治立场预测进程。(2) 此外,考虑到在政治立场预测过程中出现的对立的政治立场(隐含的)和外部知识(基)之间的微妙和重要差异,我们通过两个独立的政治知识水平、K-G的准确性、通过不同的数据系统展示(K-G)和K-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-S-S-S-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-D-D-C-C-D-D-C-D-C-C-C-C-C-C-D-D-C-D-D-D-D-L-D-D-D-L-D-L-L-L-C-C-C-C-C-C-D-L-L-L-C-C-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L</s>