In this paper, we consider a novel $M$-ary sequential hypothesis testing problem in which an adversary is present and perturbs the distributions of the samples before the decision maker observes them. This problem is formulated as a sequential adversarial hypothesis testing game played between the decision maker and the adversary. This game is a zero-sum and strategic one. We assume the adversary is active under \emph{all} hypotheses and knows the underlying distribution of observed samples. We adopt this framework as it is the worst-case scenario from the perspective of the decision maker. The goal of the decision maker is to minimize the expectation of the stopping time to ensure that the test is as efficient as possible; the adversary's goal is, instead, to maximize the stopping time. We derive a pair of strategies under which the asymptotic Nash equilibrium of the game is attained. We also consider the case in which the adversary is not aware of the underlying hypothesis and hence is constrained to apply the same strategy regardless of which hypothesis is in effect. Numerical results corroborate our theoretical findings.
翻译:在本文中, 我们考虑一个小说 $M$ 的连续假设测试问题, 对手在其中出现, 并干扰了样本在决策者观察之前的分布。 这个问题被设计成决策者和对手之间相继的对抗假设测试游戏。 这个游戏是零和战略性的游戏。 我们假设对手在\ emph{ all} 假设下活跃, 并知道所观察到样品的基本分布。 我们采用这个框架, 因为从决策者的角度看, 这是最坏的假设。 决策者的目标是尽可能减少对停止时间的期望, 以确保试验尽可能有效; 对手的目标是尽量延长停止时间。 我们的目标是要制定一对战略, 实现游戏的无损纳什平衡。 我们还考虑对手不知道基本假设的情况, 因此, 我们不得不采用同样的策略, 不论假设是哪一种, 数字结果证实了我们的理论结论 。