This paper describes current progress on developing an ethical architecture for robots that are designed to follow human ethical decision-making processes. We surveyed both regular adults (folks) and ethics experts (experts) on what they consider to be ethical behavior in two specific scenarios: pill-sorting with an older adult and game playing with a child. A key goal of the surveys is to better understand human ethical decision-making. In the first survey, folk responses were based on the subject's ethical choices ("folk morality"); in the second survey, expert responses were based on the expert's application of different formal ethical frameworks to each scenario. We observed that most of the formal ethical frameworks we included in the survey (Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, Ethics of Care and Virtue Ethics) and "folk morality" were conservative toward deception in the high-risk task with an older adult when both the adult and the child had significant performance deficiencies.
翻译:本文介绍目前为机器人开发一个符合人类道德决策进程的伦理架构的进展情况。我们调查了正规成人(民众)和道德操守专家(专家)在两种具体情景下认为什么是道德行为:与老年人使用避孕药和与儿童玩游戏。调查的一个关键目标是更好地了解人类道德决策。在第一次调查中,民间反应是基于该主题的道德选择(“民俗道德”);在第二次调查中,专家反应依据的是专家对每种情景采用不同的正式的道德框架。我们发现,我们列入调查的大多数正式道德框架(实用主义、康提主义道德、护理道德和道德)和“民俗道德”都是保守的,目的是在成人和儿童有重大性能缺陷时欺骗老年人的高风险任务。