The 2016 US election was a watershed event where an electoral intervention by an adversarial state made extensive use of networks of software robots and data driven communications which transformed the interference into a goal driven functionality of man-machine collaboration. Reviewing the debates post the debacle, we reflect upon the policy consequences of the use of Social Botnets and understand the impact of their adversarial operation in terms of catalysing institutional decay, growing infrastructural anxieties, increased industry regulations, more vulnerable Individuals and more distorted ideas, and most importantly, the emergence of an unintended constituency in form of the bot agency itself. The article first briefly introduces the nature and evolution of Social Botnets, and then moves over to discussing the policy consequences. For future work, it is important to understand the agency and collective properties of these software robots, in order to design the institutional and socio-technical mechanisms which mitigate the risk of adversarial social engineering using these bots from interfering into democratic processes.
翻译:2016年的美国大选是一个分水岭事件,在这个事件中,一个敌对国家的选举干预广泛利用软件机器人和数据驱动通信网络,从而将干扰转化为人为机器合作的驱动功能。 在审查这场辩论之后,我们反思了社会植物网的使用所带来的政策后果,并理解其对抗操作在催化体制衰败、基础设施日益焦虑、产业监管增加、个人更加脆弱和观点更加扭曲等方面的影响,最重要的是,出现了一个以机器人机构本身形式出现的无意的支持者。 文章首先简要介绍了社会植物网的性质和演变,然后又开始讨论政策后果。 对于未来的工作来说,重要的是了解这些软件机器人的机构和集体特性,以便设计机构和社会技术机制来减轻使用这些机器人干预民主进程的对抗性社会工程的风险。