Statistical inference as a formal scientific method to covert experience to knowledge has proven to be elusively difficult. While frequentist and Bayesian methodologies have been accepted in the contemporary era as two dominant schools of thought, it has been a good part of the last hundred years to see growing interests in development of more sound methods, both philosophically, in terms of scientific meaning of inference, and mathematically, in terms of exactness and efficiency. These include Fisher's fiducial argument, the Dempster-Shafe theory of belief functions, generalized fiducial, Confidence Distributions, and the most recently proposed inferential framework, called Inferential Models. Since it is notoriously challenging to make exact and efficient inference about the Cauchy distribution, this article takes it as an example to elucidate different schools of thought on statistical inference. It is shown that the standard approach of Inferential Models produces exact and efficient prior-free probabilistic inference on the location and scale parameters of the Cauchy distribution, whereas all other existing methods suffer from various difficulties.
翻译:事实证明,将统计推论作为向知识隐瞒经验的一种正式科学方法是难以捉摸的。虽然常客主义和巴伊西亚方法在当代被接受为两大主要思想学派,但在过去100年中,在哲学上,从推论的科学意义和数学上,从精确性和效率的角度,人们越来越关心制定更健全的方法,无论是从哲学角度,还是从理论角度,从精确性和效率角度,都看到这些方法越来越受关注。这些方法包括Fisher的理论、信仰功能的普适-Shafe理论、普遍传播、信任分配以及最近提出的推论框架,即“推论模型 ” 。由于对Cauchy的分布作出准确和高效的推论是众所周知的,因此,这篇文章将它作为阐明不同统计推论派的范例。 这表明,“推论模型”的标准方法对Cauchy的分布地点和规模参数产生了准确而有效的前无保障性推论,而所有其他现有方法则都面临各种困难。