When an adversary gets access to the data sample in the adversarial robustness models and can make data-dependent changes, how has the decision maker consequently, relying deeply upon the adversarially-modified data, to make statistical inference? How can the resilience and elasticity of the network be literally justified from a game theoretical viewpoint $-$ if there exists a tool to measure the aforementioned elasticity? The principle of byzantine resilience distributed hypothesis testing (BRDHT) is considered in this paper for cognitive radio networks (CRNs) $-$ without-loss-of-generality, something that can be extended to any type of homogeneous or heterogeneous networks. We use the temporal rate of the $\alpha-$leakage as the appropriate tool which we measure the aforementioned resilience through. We take into account the main problem from an information theoretic point of view via an exploration over the \textit{adversarial robustness} of distributed hypothesis testing rules. We chiefly examine if one can write $\mathbb{F}=ma$ for the main problem, consequently, we define a nested bi-level $-$ even 3-level including a hidden control-law $-$ mean-field-game (MFG) realisation solving the control dynamics as well. Further discussions are also provided e.g. the synchronisation. Our novel online algorithm $-$ which is named $\mathbb{OBRDHT}$ $-$ and solution are both unique and generic over which an evaluation is finally performed by simulations.
翻译:当对手在对抗性稳健性模型中获取数据样本并能够进行数据依赖性变化时,决策者如何因此在深度依赖对抗性修改数据的情况下进行统计推断?如果存在测量上述弹性的工具,那么网络的弹性和弹性从游戏理论角度如何从理论上讲真正合理?本文中考虑了认知式无线电网络(CRNs) $-美元分布式假设测试(BRDHT) 的原则(BRDHT), 并且可以不损及一般性, 某些可以扩展至任何类型的同质或混杂性网络。我们使用 $\ alpha- $leakage的时速率作为我们衡量上述弹性的适当工具。我们通过对分布式假设测试规则的勘探,将主要的问题从信息论点的角度加以考虑。我们主要研究的是,一个人能为主要问题写 $\ mathb{F ⁇ ma$(F%ma), 因此,我们定义双基- $(al- g) levelal-alal-alalalal exalal exal exal-al-al-al-alalal-al-alization, 美元(甚至3美元) laf-al-al-al-al-al-al-al-lax-al-al-al-al-al-lax) laxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx。