Studying causal effects of continuous exposures is important for gaining a deeper understanding of many interventions, policies, or medications, yet researchers are often left with observational studies for doing so. In the observational setting, confounding is a barrier to estimation of causal effects. Weighting approaches seek to control for confounding by reweighting samples so that confounders are comparable across different values of the exposure, yet for continuous exposures, weighting methods are highly sensitive to model misspecification. In this paper we elucidate the key property that makes weights effective in estimating causal quantities involving continuous exposures. We show that to eliminate confounding, weights should make exposure and confounders independent on the weighted scale. We develop a measure that characterizes the degree to which a set of weights induces such independence. Further, we propose a new model-free method for weight estimation by optimizing our measure. We study the theoretical properties of our measure and our weights, and prove that our weights can explicitly mitigate exposure-confounder dependence. The empirical effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated in a suite of challenging numerical experiments, where we find that our weights are quite robust and work well under a broad range of settings.
翻译:持续接触的因果关系研究对于加深了解许多干预措施、政策或药物非常重要,但研究人员往往要为此进行观察研究。在观察环境中,混杂是估计因果关系的一个障碍。加权方法试图控制通过重新加权抽样混杂的混杂,以便混淆者在接触的不同值上具有可比性,但对于连续接触而言,加权方法对模型的偏差非常敏感。在本文件中,我们阐明了使权重在估计持续接触的因果关系数量方面产生效力的关键属性。我们证明,要消除混杂,重量应使接触成为独立的,使沉积者成为在加权规模上独立的。我们制定了一套衡量标准,以说明一组权重促成这种独立性的程度。此外,我们提出了一种新的无模型方法,通过优化我们的测量方法来估计重量;我们研究了我们的测量尺度的理论属性和重量,并证明我们的重量可以明确减轻接触的偏重依赖性。我们方法的经验效力体现在一系列具有挑战性的数值实验中,我们发现,我们的重量在其中的模型下,我们发现我们体重是相当稳健健健的。