Increasing urbanization puts ever-increasing pressure on cities to prioritize sustainable growth and avoid carbon lock-in, yet available modeling frameworks and tools fall acutely short of robustly guiding such pivotal decision-making at the local level. Financial incentives, behavioral interventions, and mandates can drive technology adoption, while land-use zoning policies provide the framework for development of the built environment. Often policies and their impacts are evaluated top down, typically on a national scale, or post-hoc on developments vis-\`a-vis different policies in the past. Such high-level analyses and post-hoc evaluations cannot show possible developments pathways for specific cities, and hence cannot serve as input to policymakers at the local level such as county, municipal, or city governments. Here, we present IMPACT pathways from a bottom-up model with residence level granularity that integrate policy for technology adoption with zoning policy, climate change, and grid decarbonization scenarios. With the city at the heart of the analysis, our results show potential greenhouse gas emission pathways, identify synergies and trade-offs between policies, and show the importance of appropriate baselines.
翻译:城市化的不断增长给城市带来了越来越大的压力,要求城市优先考虑可持续增长,避免碳锁定,然而,现有的示范框架和工具却严重不足,无法有力地指导地方一级的关键决策。 财政激励、行为干预和授权可以推动技术的采用,而土地使用区划政策则为建设环境提供了框架。 通常,政策及其影响被从头到尾地评估,通常是在全国范围内评估,或者对过去不同政策的发展情况进行后期评估。 这种高级分析和热后评估无法显示特定城市可能的发展道路,因此无法成为地方层面决策者的投入,如县、市或市政府。 在这里,我们介绍了自下而上模式的IMPACT路径,该模式将采用技术的政策与规划政策、气候变化和电网去碳化情景相结合。 在分析的核心城市,我们的结果展示了潜在的温室气体排放路径,确定政策之间的协同作用和取舍,并展示了适当基线的重要性。